31.10.21 Accuracy of Automated Blood Pressure Assessment Device Confirmed by Mercury Sphygmomanometer

Original Article

 

Accuracy of BP from different Devices

Accuracy of Automated Blood Pressure Assessment Device Confirmed by Mercury Sphygmomanometer

Muhammad Shafiq1, Irfan Ullah1, Irfan Khan1, Khalid Khan1, Khalil Ahmad2 and Waseem Ur Rahman3

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the accuracy of automated blood pressure assessment device confirmed by mercury sphygmomanometer.

Study Design: Cross sectional study

Place and Duration of study: This study was conducted at Pediatric department Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex Nowshera from July 2019 to December 2019.

Materials and Methods: In this study a total of 212 patients were observed. All the children were put on an examination bed over 45 degree angle and a rest period was allotted of approximately 5 minutes. After rest period, the BP both systolic and diastolic was measured using Omron HEM-907XL automated BP measuring device. From each patient, three readings were obtained and an average of these three readings was recorded for further analysis. After BP measured with automated device, another rest period of 5 minutes was give to each participant of the study before measuring the BP using standard mercury sphygmomanometer.

Results: The mean age of patients was 10 ± 7.53 years. There were 56% males and 44% female children. Mean BMI was 25Kg/m2 with SD ± 4.463.  More over automated BP was accurate in 72% patients and was not
accurate in 28%.

Conclusion: Our study concludes that the accuracy of automated BP measuring device was 72% confirmed by mercury sphygmomanometer.

Key Words: accuracy, automated blood pressure, mercury sphygmomanometer

Citation of article: Shafiq M, Irfan Ullah, Khan I, Khan K, Ahmad K, Rahman W. Accuracy of Automated Blood Pressure Assessment Device Confirmed by Mercury Sphygmomanometer. Med Forum 2020;31(10):88-91.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Raised BP or hypertension is one of the most leading cause of mortality all over the world. It may cause about 12.8% of all the deaths occurring around the world, including 51% deaths related to stroke and 45% deaths related to the of coronary artery disease. Increasing age is a major non-modifiable factor that leads to hypertension; as 90% individuals can develop certainly develop hypertension in their lives after the age of fifty five years.1-3

 

 

1. Department of Pediatric, Nowshera medical    college/Qazi Hussain Ahmad medical Complex Nowshera.

2. Department of Pediatric, Bacha Khan Medical College/ Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan

3. Department of Pediatric, Peshawar medical college/Mercy Teaching Hospital Peshawar

 

 

Correspondence: Dr Irfan Khan, Assistant Professor of Peads, Nowshera Medical College, Nowshera.

Contact No: 033369205808

Email: drirfankhan1984@gmail.com

 

 

Received:    June, 2020

Accepted:    September, 2020

Printed:        October, 2020

 

 

 

The increase in the incidence of hypertension in young adults is alarming. The Bogalusa Heart Study and Patho-biological Determinates of Atherosclerosis in Youth study determined that among autopsies, the increased atherosclerosis was the reason for elevated blood pressure in young individuals. Consequently, the accurate measurement of blood pressure and proper treatment of this elevated blood pressure in pediatrics age group and in adolescence is necessary to prevent the development of cardiovascular diseases. It has been suggested that the ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure can be a better prognostic than clinical assessment for the prediction of cardiovascular complications and deaths in adult individuals. Thus, the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is increasing for evaluation of hypertension and the risk of end-organ impairment in adults.4-8

But there are some problems with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring that must be taken into consideration. Several automated ambulatory blood pressure devices depend on oscillometric method, which is observed to have less accuracy than examining the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) than systolic blood pressure (SBP). However, this may be false for many devices. Alternatively, all the indirect methods for assessment of blood pressure are less accurate for determination of both SBP &DBP as compared to direct intra-arterial measurements.9-11

New tools for the assessment of blood pressure including the automatic oscillometric blood pressure devices are replacing the gold standard tool i.e. mercury sphygmomanometer in numerous clinical set-ups. But, there are the circumstances where the replacement of oscillometric for auscultator devices could have mostly severe ramifications for patients, like when patient have either hypertension or hypotension. Though, further studies are warranted regarding the use of aneroid sphygmomanometer as the improved replacement of mercury device. In a study, the accuracy of oscillometricblood pressure device was 81%that measure the blood pressure accurately, while it as reported as 70.28% in the other study.12-14

The present study was designed to determine the accuracy of automated BP monitoring devices compared to the mercury sphygmomanometer. As mentioned above, there is a threat of rise in the cardiovascular diseases among pediatric population and there are a No of devices which run on automated ocillometric principles for measuring the BP. This study would be very useful in determining the accuracy of automated BP measuring devices which are commonly used for BP monitoring for children at homes and clinics. This study will give us local statistics about the accuracy of these devices and on the basis of results of this study, we will formulate future research recommendations which will help us in efficient monitoring of BP of children at homes and at clinics.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cross sectional study was done at pediatric department Qazi Hussain Ahmad medical complex Nowshera. Sample size was 212 keeping 70.28%14 proportion of accuracy (sensitivity) of automated BP measuring device, 95% confidence level and 6% margin of error using WHO sample size formula. Sampling technique used was consecutive (non probability) sampling. Children of age 3-18 years of both gender were included while children with diagnosed hypertension, history of any type of cardiovascular abnormality, congenital heart problems were excluded. All the children who fulfilled the selection criteria were enrolled from the OPD. Consent form was taken from parents or guardians attending the child. Then detailed history and clinical examination was done in all children. All the children were put on an examination bed over 45O angle and a rest period was allotted of approximately 5 minutes. After rest period, the BP both systolic and diastolic was measured using Omron HEM-907XL automated BP measuring device. From each patient, three readings were obtained and an average of these three readings was recorded for further analysis. After BP measured with automated device, another rest period of 5 minutes was given to each participant of the study before measuring the BP using standard mercury sphygmomanometer. Accuracy was determined in terms of number of patients having automated device measured systolic BP+ 5mmHg and Diastolic BP+ 3mmHg as confirmed by mercury sphygmomanometer. Data was entered and analyzed via SPSS v. 20. Mean + SD was calculated for numerical variables like age, Systolic BP, Diastolic BP, height, weight & BMI. Frequency & percentage were calculated for categorical variables like gender, true positive, false negative& sensitivity.

RESULTS

The mean age of children included in the study was 10 ± 7.53 years. There were 89 (42%) children of age 3-10 years, while 123 (58%) children were of age range 11-18 years. Out of 212 children, there were 119(56%) males and 93(44%) females. The mean systolic BP was 110 ± 12.56, mean diastolic BP was 80 ± 12.56, mean height was 1.3 ± 1.102 meters and mean weight was 30 ± 6.271 Kg. BMI distribution among 212 patients was analyzed as 187(88%) patients had BMI ≤25 Kg/m2 and 25(12%) patients had BMI >25% Kg/m2. Mean BMI was 25 ± 4.46 Kg/m2. (table no 1)

Accuracy of the automated BP assessment device among 212 candidates was analyzed as the measurement of automated BP device was accurate in 152 (73.1%) patients. (Table no 2)

Table No. 1. Demographics of patients

N

212

Age

10 ± 7.53

3-10 Years

89 (42%)

11-18 years

123 (58%)

Male

119 (56%)

Female

93 (44%)

Systolic BP

110 ± 12.56

Diastolic BP

80 ± 8.81

Height

1.3 ± 1.10

Weight

30 ± 6.27

BMI

25 ± 4.46

≤25 Kg/m2

187 (88%)

>25 Kg/m2

25 (12%)

Table No. 2: Accuracy (Sensitivity) of automated BP measuring device confirmed by mercury sphygmomanometer.

Hypertension on

Mercury Sphygmomanometer

Total

Positive

Negative

Automated device

Positive

152

1

153

Negative

56

3

59

Total

208

4

212

Sensitivity = 73.1%    

Kappa = 0.062

 

DISCUSSION

Hypertension or elevated BP is normally observed in aged candidate, and this rise usually occur after age of 40-50 years, and about 90% individuals develop hypertension after age of 55 years. But elevated BP has also been observed pediatric population also.1-3 Our study concludes that mean age of candidates was 10 ± 7.53 years. There were 56% males and 44% females. Mean BMI was 25Kg/m2 with SD ± 4.463.  Moreover, automated BP was accurate in 72% cases.

Similar findings were reported by another research done by Ostchega et al. They presented the accuracy of oscillometric BP instruments for accurately measuring the BP was recorded in 81% of participants and it was reported as 70.28%.14

Similar finding were noticed in previous studies. A study by Natalie et al., found the validity of device in 61% studies which used as standard protocol. Only 34% studies where the device was effectively confirmed were executed without violation in protocols.15

In another study Mansoor et al., had conducted a study on 200 individuals. The mean difference in SBP was 8.54 ± 9.38 mmHg while the mean difference in DBP was 4.21 ± 7.88 mmHg. Eighty nine individuals have already known hypertension; and the difference of mean SBP was 9.43 ± 9.89 mmHg (p-value = 0.000) and difference in mean DBP was 4.26 ± 7.35 (p-value = 0.000).16

In another study Lim et al.,conducted a study on 454 patients with the mean age of 50.7± 15.4 years. The mean SBPs was 119.8 ± 139 mmHg on the MM while 119.5 ± 13.6 mmHg on AD in males,whereas among females, the mean SBPs was 115.0±16.8 mmHg on MM and 111.6±15.7 mmHg on AD. The mean DBP among males was 77.7±10.4 mmHg on MM while 74.7±10.4 mmHg on AD, whereas among females, the mean BDP was 73.2±9.3 mmHg on MM and 69.9±10.3 mmHg on AD. The kappa statistics was0.6538 (0.5436–0.7641) for detection of hypertension. The diagnostic sensitivity for hypertension was 59.0%.17

CONCLUSION

Our study concludes that the diagnostic accuracy of the automated BPassessment device was 72% confirmed by mercury sphygmomanometer.

Author’s Contribution:

Concept & Design of Study:

Muhammad Shafiq

Drafting:

Irfan Ullah, Irfan Khan

Data Analysis:

Khalid Khan, Khalil Ahmad, Waseem Ur Rahman

Revisiting Critically:

Muhammad Shafiq,
Irfan Ullah

Final Approval of version:

Muhammad Shafiq

Conflict of Interest: The study has no conflict of interest to declare by any author.

REFERENCES

1.      Organization WH. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks: World Health Organization; 2009.

2.      MEMBERS WG, Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014;129(3):e28.

3.      Flynn JT, Urbina EM. Pediatric ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: indications and interpretations. J Clin Hyper 2012;14(6):372-82.

4.      Gidding SS, Rana JS, Prendergast C, McGill H, Carr JJ, Liu K, et al. Pathobiological determinants of atherosclerosis in youth (PDAY) risk score in young adults predicts coronary artery and abdominal aorta calcium in middle age: the CARDIA study. Circulation 2016;133(2):139-46.

5.      Lai C-C, Sun D, Cen R, Wang J, Li S, Fernandez-Alonso C, et al. Impact of long-term burden of excessive adiposity and elevated blood pressure from childhood on adulthood left ventricular remodeling patterns: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64(15):1580-7.

6.      Epoig FOR, Children RRI. Expert panel on integrated guidelines for cardiovascular health and risk reduction in children and adolescents: summary report. Pediatr 2011;128(Suppl 5):S213.

7.      Koivistoinen T, Hutri-Kähönen N, Juonala M, Aatola H, Kööbi T, Lehtimäki T, et al. Metabolic syndrome in childhood and increased arterial stiffness in adulthood—The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Annals Med 2011;43(4):
312-9.

8.      KingSchultz L, Weaver AL, Cramer CH. Correlation of Blood Pressure Readings From 6Hour Intervals With the Daytime Period of 24Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Pediatric Patients. J Clin Hypertens 2012; 14(6):396-400.

9.      Skirton H, Chamberlain W, Lawson C, Ryan H, Young E. A systematic review of variability and reliability of manual and automated blood pressure readings. J Clin Nursing 2011;20(56):602-14.

10.  Flynn JT. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children: imperfect yet essential. Pediatr Nephrol 2011;26(12):2089.

11.  Smulyan H, Safar ME. Blood pressure measurement: retrospective and prospective views. Am J Hypertension 2011;24(6):628-34.

12.  Urbina EM, Khoury PR, McCoy CE, Daniels SR, Dolan LM, Kimball TR. Comparison of mercury blood pressure readings to oscillometric and central blood pressure in predicting target organ damage in youth. Blood pressure monitoring 2015;20(3):150.

13.  Ostchega Y, Prineas RJ, Nwankwo T, Zipf G. Assessing blood pressure accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a national survey environment. Am J Hypertens 2011;24(3):322-7.

14.  Ostchega Y. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and …; 2012.

15.  Bello NA, Woolley JJ, Cleary KL, Falzon L, Alpert BS, Oparil S, et al. Accuracy of blood pressure measurement devices in pregnancy: a systematic review of validation studies. Hypertension 2018;71(2):326-35.

16.  Mansoor K, Shahnawaz S, Rasool M, Chaudhry H, Ahuja G, Shahnawaz S. Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: a randomized crossover trial in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan: are third world countries ready for the change? Open access Macedonian J Med Sci 2016;4(3):404.

17.  Lim Y-H, Choi SY, Oh KW, Kim Y, Cho ES, Choi BY, et al. Comparison between an automated device and a manual mercury sphygmomanometer in an epidemiological survey of hypertension prevalence. Am J Hypertension 2014;27(4):537-45.