31.9.36 Analysis of Sources of Distress Among Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Pakistan

Original Article

 

Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Analysis of Sources of Distress Among Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Pakistan

Muhammad Khalid, Liaqat Ali Zia, Mudassir Rasool, Imran Amin, Muhammad Ansar Aslam and Hafiz Muhammad Khizar Nawaz Cheema

ABSTRACT

Objective: To find the sources of distress among patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer in Pakistan.

Study Design: Analytic study.

Place and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, at DHQ Teaching Hospital Gujranwala during March 2019 till November 2019,

Materials and Methods: This study was done with the permission of ethical committee of hospital and with the permission of patients. Total 50 patients of colorectal cancer were selected for this study.

Results: The consequences of distress screening through the polls are appeared in Table 2. Among the 50 patients, 10 (33.6%) were distinguished as patients with mental distress. Utilizing the MDT, 20 patients detailed sleep deprivation (21.8%), 69 nervousness (30.1%), or 20 discouragement (29.7%). The quantity of patients who scored over the cutoff esteem in HADS-A, HADS-D, and CES-D was 62 (27.1%), 92 (40.2%), and 76 (33.2%), individually.

Conclusion: It is concluded that psychological distress is a common factor among cancer patients.

Key Words: Sources, Distress, Patients, Surgery, Colorectal Cancer

Citation of article: Khalid M, Zia LA, Rasool M, Amin I, Aslam MA, Cheema HMKN. Analysis of Sources of Distress Among Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Pakistan. Med Forum 2020;31(9):154-157.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most predominant tumors and reasons for disease related mortality in created nations, with over 1.3 million new malignancy cases and 694,000 passing assessed to have happened in 2012 worldwide in 2012. The mean 5-year endurance rate is as of now 59%1. Around 40-half of patients create metastatic illness. Future of patients with metastatic infection is around 30 month2.

In patients with malignancy there is noteworthy proof of psychological distress. Psychological distress is characterized as a multifactorial, disagreeable, enthusiastic experience of a psychological (intellectual, conduct, passionate), social and/or otherworldly nature that may meddle with the capacity to adapt successfully to disease, its physical indications, and its treatment3.

 

Distress stretches out along a continuum, extending from regular typical sentiments of weakness, pity, and fears, to issues that can get debilitating, for example,

 

Department of General Surgery DHQ Teaching Hospital Gujranwala.

 

 

Correspondence: Dr. Muhammad Khalid, Assistant Professor of General Surgery DHQ Teaching Hospital Gujranwala.

Contact No: 0300-6430251

Email: khalidiqbalfbr@gmail.com

 

 

Received:    May, 2020

Accepted:    July, 2020

Printed:        September, 2020

 

 

depression, anxiety, alarm, social separation, and existential and otherworldly emergency. Earlier examinations showed that most of patients can adapt to the psychological weight that can be brought about by hearing the determination, experiencing the infection or its treatment4. In any case, albeit exact appraisals shift with various sorts and locales of malignancy, around 30-40% of patients accepting disease care experience psychological side effects of distress, for example, depression and anxiety. These discoveries likewise apply to patients with CRC: an enormous extent of patients appears to experience the ill effects of psychological bleakness, the presence of metastases is related with significantly more psychological manifestations5.

An expected 33% of patients with malignant growth will encounter clinically critical distress, for example, anxiety or depression that is related with their analysis and treatment. The presence of anxiety and depression has been appeared to adversely affect health results and personal satisfaction in patients with malignancy. Distress reaches out along a continuum from ordinary sentiments of misery and dread to debilitating segments of depression, anxiety, and existential emergency. Distress is known to be multifactorial and may meddle with a patient's capacity to adapt to treatment4.

Therefore, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer suggest screening all new disease patients for distress. Also, it is realized that among every single careful patient, anxiety and depression are common. Indeed, in one examination, over a large portion of the patients going through medical procedure screened positive for depression and 33% had anxiety. Colorectal medical procedure patients specifically are at a novel danger due to the enthusiastic worry of the chance of having an ostomy and the adjustments where medical procedure influences gastrointestinal function6.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted at DHQ Teaching Hospital Gujranwala during March 2019 till November 2019. This study was done with the permission of ethical committee of hospital and with the permission of patients. Total 50 patients of colorectal cancer were selected for this study.

Data collection: Once patients were enlisted and informed consent was taken patients were given a progression of approved patient-detailed surveys to catch benchmark levels of utilitarian freedom, side effects of anxiety and depression, personal satisfaction, and fulfillment with careful care in the event that they had gone through medical procedure. Extra data was gathered from the clinical record including the clinical or pathologic stage, therapy with chemotherapy or radiation, length of remain, inconveniences, and readmissions. Semi organized, open-finished, one-on-one meetings were led between a specialist prepared in subjective talking and the patient.

The data was collected and statistically analysed using SPSS.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the socio-demographic and clinical data of the evaluable 50 patients. The median age of the patients was 56 years, and 167/229 were male. Most patients were hitched, and the greater part of the members were secondary school instructed or higher and jobless.

The consequences of distress screening through the polls are appeared in Table 2. Among the 50 patients, 10 (33.6%) were distinguished as patients with mental distress. Utilizing the MDT, 20 patients detailed sleep deprivation (21.8%), 69 nervousness (30.1%), or 20 discouragement (29.7%). The quantity of patients who scored over the cutoff esteem in HADS-A, HADS-D, and CES-D was 62 (27.1%), 92 (40.2%), and 76 (33.2%), individually.

 

 

Table No.1: Baseline characteristics

 

N = 50

%

Age

 Median

56

 Range

20–86

Smoking

 Smoker

46

20.1

 Non-Smoker

183

79.9

Marital status

 Married

196

85.6

 Single

17

7.4

 Widowed

12

5.2

 Divorced

4

1.7

Educational level

 Elementary school

24

10.5

 Middle school

27

11.8

 High school

86

37.6

 Undergraduate

74

32.3

 Graduate school

18

7.9

Employment status

 Full-time job

82

35.8

 Part-time job

26

11.4

 Unemployed

82

35.8

Histology

 Tubular adenocarcinoma

161

70.3

 Signet ring cell carcinoma

58

25.3

 Mucinous carcinoma

5

2.2

Others

5

2.2

Adjuvant chemotherapy

 Platinum-based doublet (SP or FP)

56/83

67.5

 TS-1 monotherapy

22/83

26.5

Table No.2: Prevalence of psychological distress by disease stage

 

All Patients

Stage I-III

Stage IV

 

N = 10

%

N = 20

%

N = 20

%

P-value

MDT

93

40.6

46

34.8

47

48.5

0.038

 Insomnia

50

21.8

28

21.2

22

22.7

0.79

 Anxiety

69

30.1

30

22.7

39

40.2

0.004

 Depression

68

29.7

31

23.5

37

38.1

0.016

HADS

106

46.3

52

39.4

54

55.7

0.015

 HADS-A

62

27.1

29

22

33

34

0.043

 HADS-D

92

40.2

45

34.1

47

48.5

0.028

CES-D

76

33.2

38

28.8

38

39.2

0.099

Psychological distress

77

33.6

35

26.5

42

43.3

0.008

MDT Modified Distress Thermometer, HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, CES-D Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale

 

 

DISCUSSION

Mental help is a significant aspect of the multidisciplinary approach, yet there is no investigation that explicitly assessed the mental distress in gastric malignant growth, which is the most well-known disease in Korea7. As far as anyone is concerned, this is the principal study to investigate the predominance and prognostic effect of mental distress among an enormous number of patients with gastric malignant growth. In our examination partner of gastric malignant growth patients, critical mental distress was distinguished in 33.6% of patients. Likewise, we found that mental distress has a helpless prognostic effect for gastric disease patients8.

The presence of mental distress is a risk factor for treatment defiance. A meta-investigation showed that obstruction was more unmistakable in patients with wretchedness stood out from non-debilitated patients. Accordingly, it is basic to perceive the patients who may be exposed against mental distress to improve treatment adherence9. We found that the patients with front line disorder, low degrees of guidance, and who were female were found to be essentially powerless against mental distress. These disclosures are proportional to past investigations. A couple of assessments itemized a higher power of mental distress in patients with lower guidance. Lower adjusting capacities seem to add to the higher movement of mental distress in those with little education10.

Concerning the example's portrayal, there was no prescient part between the contemplated classes (segment data and qualities of the sickness) in the variable gender. This outcome, notwithstanding, demonstrates that the distinctions found as far as distress, the sort and recurrence of issues announced, are more related to gender than to the remaining socio-segment qualities (age, conjugal status, training) and to clinical perspectives (kind of malignancy and staging)11.

When all is said in done, there was a huge impact for the variable 'gender' in the three phases of appraisal, with a huge decline over time12. We guess that such proof shows a steady variation of patients to the malignancy experience. As the nature of care gave in the contemplated office might be a key factor for such turns of events, further investigations with comparative examples in various health administrations are required with the end goal of comparison13.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that psychological distress is a common factor among cancer patients. Our outcomes feature an expected function for a complete screening system to distinguish which patients need help with tending to wellsprings of distress during the careful experience. Seeing how wellsprings of distress may change by time will assist us with fitting intercessions at various time purposes of the careful experience.

Author’s Contribution:

Concept & Design of Study:

Muhammad Khalid

Drafting:

Liaqat Ali Zia, Mudassir Rasool

Data Analysis:

Imran Amin, Muhammad Ansar Aslam, Hafiz Muhammad Khizar Nawaz Cheema

Revisiting Critically:

Muhammad Khalid, Liaqat Ali Zia

Final Approval of version:

Muhammad Khalid

Conflict of Interest: The study has no conflict of interest to declare by any author.

REFERENCES

1.      Stark D, Kiely M, Smith A, Velikova G, House A, Selby P. Anxiety disorders in cancer patients: their nature, associations, and relation to quality of life. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:3137–3148.

2.      Gill D, Hatcher S. A systematic review of the treatment of depression with antidepressant drugs in patients who also have a physical illness. J Psychosom Res 1999;47:131–143. 

3.      Baider L, Perry S, Sison A, Holland J, Uziely B, DeNour AK. The role of psychological variables in a group of melanoma patients. An Israeli sample. Psychosomatics 1997;38(1), 45-53.

4.      Carlson LE, Waller A, Groff SL, Bultz BD. Screening for distress, the sixth vital sign, in lung cancer patients: effects on pain, fatigue, and common problems – secondary outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Psycho-Oncol 2013; 22(8):1880-1888.

5.      Goodwin PJ, Leszcz M, Ennis M, Koopmans J, Vincent L, Guther H, et al. The effect of group psychosocial support on survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345(24):1719–1726.

6.      Matsushita T, Matsushima E, Maruyama M. Anxiety and depression of patients with digestive cancer. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2005;59(5):
576–583.

7.      Elliott J, Fallows A, Staetsky L, Smith PWF, Foster CL, Maher EJ, et al. The health and well-being of cancer survivors in the UK: findings from a population-based survey. Br J Cancer 2011; 105(S1):S11–20.

8.      Medeiros M, Oshima CTF, Forones NM. Depression and anxiety in colorectal cancer patients. J Gastrointest Cancer 2010;41(3):179–84.

9.      Ohlsson-Nevo E, Karlsson J, Nilsson U. Effects of a psycho-educational programme on health-related quality of life in patients treated for colorectal and anal cancer: a feasibility trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2016;21:181–8.

10.  Mosher CE, Winger JG, Given BA, Shahda S, Helft PR. A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2017;25(7):1–14.

11.  Tourani S, Behzadifar M, Martini M, Aryankhesal A, TaheriMirghaed M, Salemi M, et al. Health-related quality of life among healthy elderly Iranians: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2018;16:18

12.  Osborn RL, Demoncada AC, Feuerstein M. Psychosocial interventions for depression, anxiety, and quality of life in cancer survivors: meta-analyses. Int J Psychiatr Med 2006;36(1):13–34. 

13.  Hedges LV. Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. J Educ Behav Stat 1981;6(2):107–28.